Documents

Beautiful design is now a commodity.

Beautiful design is now a commodity. I've spent the last 24 hours with ChatGPT 4o images, and it's clear we've entered a new reality: "Execution is cheap, ideas are everything." For decades, we were told the opposite. Everyone had ideas. Few could execute them well. The ability to turn a concept into reality separated the winners from the dreamers. But in an AI world, it's completely flipped. When anyone can execute at 90% perfection with the right prompts, the limiting factor becomes the quality of your ideas. The creative direction. The strategic insight. The unique perspective. The most successful companies I'm seeing are shifting resources from production to ideation. Less time pushing pixels, more time exploring concepts. They're running 20-30 creative directions where they used to do 2-3, because the cost of trying ideas has collapsed. In a world where anyone can create a beautiful website, logo, or packaging, the winners are focusing on the things AI can't (yet) simulate: I think it's authentic relationships, innovative products, and unique perspectives. The real advantage is in knowing when to break the rules of good design in ways that resonate emotionally. The human touch is becoming less about execution and more about strategic deviation from the optimized norm. This is creating strange new dynamics in hiring too. When I started our design agency @meetLCA, we hired for world class technical skills - mastery of tools, execution ability. But now we care more about hiring for conceptual ability and creative direction. People who consistently generate novel ideas rather than perfect executions. Obviously, top tech skills still matter, but way less. As AI makes "good enough" design accessible to everyone, the market is splitting. At the low end, good enough is actually good enough. But at the high end, there's a premium on the truly unexpected - the ideas an AI wouldn't generate because they break conventional patterns. I think we're heading toward a bifurcated creative world: automated beauty for most purposes, with human creativity focused on creating the unexpected, the ideas and approaches an AI wouldn't think to try because they don't follow established patterns of "good design." The challenge for most of us now isn't "how do we execute this idea?" but "which ideas are actually worth executing?" Execution is cheap, ideas are everything. Tremendous alpha in it. You're an idea person now. We all are?

View on X

Performance

Key metrics and engagement highlights

Views
739,231
96.6%
CTR
3.92%
54.4%
Retention
73.5%
2.8%
Engagement
1.07%
43.6%
Growth
1,143
49.6%
Content mix
How this thread is built
Images
11%
Text only
89%
Read time
2:21
Audience retention
How far readers make it through the thread
Retention score
74%
Early retention
77%
Completion
51%
Average Tweets read5.9
Beautiful design is now a commodity.
Click on the chart to preview a tweet
This thread
Typical retention not available
Chart guide
Full Thread
Hook and key tweets
Beautiful design is now a commodity. I've spent the last 24 hours with ChatGPT 4o images, and it's clear we've entered a new reality: "Execution is cheap, ideas are everything." For decades, we were told the opposite. Everyone had ideas. Few could execute them well. The ability to turn a concept into reality separated the winners from the dreamers. But in an AI world, it's completely flipped. When anyone can execute at 90% perfection with the right prompts, the limiting factor becomes the quality of your ideas. The creative direction. The strategic insight. The unique perspective. The most successful companies I'm seeing are shifting resources from production to ideation. Less time pushing pixels, more time exploring concepts. They're running 20-30 creative directions where they used to do 2-3, because the cost of trying ideas has collapsed. In a world where anyone can create a beautiful website, logo, or packaging, the winners are focusing on the things AI can't (yet) simulate: I think it's authentic relationships, innovative products, and unique perspectives. The real advantage is in knowing when to break the rules of good design in ways that resonate emotionally. The human touch is becoming less about execution and more about strategic deviation from the optimized norm. This is creating strange new dynamics in hiring too. When I started our design agency @meetLCA, we hired for world class technical skills - mastery of tools, execution ability. But now we care more about hiring for conceptual ability and creative direction. People who consistently generate novel ideas rather than perfect executions. Obviously, top tech skills still matter, but way less. As AI makes "good enough" design accessible to everyone, the market is splitting. At the low end, good enough is actually good enough. But at the high end, there's a premium on the truly unexpected - the ideas an AI wouldn't generate because they break conventional patterns. I think we're heading toward a bifurcated creative world: automated beauty for most purposes, with human creativity focused on creating the unexpected, the ideas and approaches an AI wouldn't think to try because they don't follow established patterns of "good design." The challenge for most of us now isn't "how do we execute this idea?" but "which ideas are actually worth executing?" Execution is cheap, ideas are everything. Tremendous alpha in it. You're an idea person now. We all are?
Notes
Add observations or ideas tied to this thread

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...